Timber and carbon — the case for using treated timber to lock up more CO2


A significant highlight of last year’s COP26 Glasgow was recognition for the positive role that wood plays in tackling CO2 emissions, the principal cause of global warming.

The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference — more commonly referred to as COP26 Glasgow — highlighted just how hard it is to get united global action on climate change.

Although agreements were thin on the ground, a significant highlight of the conference was recognition for the positive role that wood plays in tackling the principal cause of global warming — CO2 emissions — and why the increased use of wood should be a key feature of strategies to decarbonise economic activity around the world.

The world has known for some time that there are only two ways to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere — to either reduce emissions, or capture and store it. Wood is unique as it can do both.

Treated wood locks carbon up for longer

Man-made materials such as concrete, steel and plastic are manufactured from finite raw materials — once they’re gone, they’re gone for good.

However, timber can be harvested indefinitely under sustainable forest management schemes. The more wood is used the more trees are planted.

Europe’s forest areas have increased by 10% over the past 30 years, at a rate of 643,000 hectares per year. In North America, sustainable forest management has resulted in more than 50 consecutive years where growth has exceeded harvest.

The benefit to the environment is substantial. Growing trees capture CO2 from the air and store it as carbon — typically 1 tonne of CO2 for every cubic metre of growth — while releasing 0.7 tonnes of the oxygen that is essential to life.

Wood’s sustainability, carbon capture and storage ability, low-energy production and sheer versatility make it a standout choice in a net-zero carbon building material strategy.

The ability to improve the durability performance of wood using modern wood protection technologies adds significantly to its versatility and efficiency.

By extending the service life of wood with a preservative or wood modification process, carbon is stored for a significantly longer time.

One of the most effective ways to decarbonising the built environment is to use treated wood and wood-based materials in place of “carbon-intensive” man-made materials such as concrete, steel and plastic.

A study by BRE Centre for Sustainable Products — an innovative British-based group of researchers, scientists, engineers and technicians who share a common goal to make the built environment better for all — further underlines the value of treated wood in tackling climate change.

The study found that a terrace made from preservative-impregnated softwood had a global warming potential 200% lower than a terrace made from concrete slabs, and 700% lower than composite plastic decking.

Eco-credentials of wood not compromised by treatment

BRE has also published guidance on how different design and material choices impact the environment, such as the Green Guide to Specification and BREEAM, the world’s leading sustainability assessment method for infrastructure and buildings.

These publications share some key conclusions about treated wood.

The first is that the wood protection process is so insignificant a factor overall as to not alter a wood product’s environmental impact rating, regardless of whether it is treated or not.

The second is that the use of chemically-treated softwood in structural and non-structural elements does not undermine the very strong environmental case for using wood.

In true circular bio-economic principles, when treated wood products have fulfilled their design service life they can be recovered, recycled into other applications, or used in a biofuel plant to generate heat and power.

Making the most of wood resources

Preservative pre-treatment and modified wood technologies make it possible to use lower-cost, low durability softwoods in a wide range of construction applications that would not otherwise be possible.

The use of wood protection technology to deliver products with a predictable service life justifies the use of wood in the face of competition from less sustainable man-made materials.

Until now, wood protection processes have been largely viewed as optional insurance against the risk of wood decay or insect attack.

But as zero-carbon strategies gather pace, the building industry is likely to rely increasingly on the science of wood protection technology.

Source: wpa.org.uk.

Previous articleFlexibility the key for smaller sawmills’ production output
Next articleFunding to increase forestry workforce in Otago