Revisiting payment claims under the Construction Contracts Act: Service

0
The Christchurch High Court decision of Arnold Jenson (2005) Ltd v Trevor James Bills & Others (CIV-2008-409-001349) covered the issue of what constitutes valid...

Bankruptcy no protection against a claim accruing after the period of bankrutpcy

0
The decision in the case of Chapman v Weathertight Homes Tribunal & Another concerns a builder that was named as a respondent to Weathertight...

Non-compliant payment claim foils statutory demand process

0
Timothy Bates of Auckland law firm Legal Vision evaluates a case that addresses the interplay between the Construction Contracts Act 2002 and the statutory...

‘Long stop’ provisions: Making sense of the 10-year limitation period in leaky building claims

0
The very recent Auckland High Court decision of Kells and Kells v Auckland City Council & Others (CIV-2008-404-1812) had to consider whether the Weathertight...

The CCA and the case of the disputed flooring invoice

0
Floorman Waikato Ltd (F) was engaged by Jonathan McRae (M) to sand and coat his floors. F said that different options and pricing for...
Rob Harris (left) and Shaun Watt.

To arbitrate or adjudicate — that is the question

0
Whatever the cause of a dispute, the only two ways for it to be resolved are by agreement of the parties (ie settlement) or...

Buyer beware principle — alive and well

0
The recent case of Ford & Anor v Ryan & Anor demonstrates the very real difficulties owners of properties with water ingress issues face...

What constitutes effective service of key legal documents?

0
It is now commonplace for many business relationship communications to be conducted predominantly in email form. Construction contracts are no exception. Typically, the key device...

The case of a relocation company’s liability in respect of a defective home

0
Tim Bates and Fiona Dobroshi of Auckland legal firm TM Bates & Co assess the High Court decision in Stott v Uplifting Homes Ltd,...

Removal applications in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal — an uphill battle?

0
While it is up to the party seeking to be removed to prove that it is fair and appropriate that they be removed, it...