Structural engineering quality concerns ‘systemic’

0
256
Engineering New Zealand Te Ao Rangahau chief executive Dr Richard Templer.
Engineering New Zealand Te Ao Rangahau chief executive Dr Richard Templer.

Engineering New Zealand Te Ao Rangahau has released a report that says quality in structural engineering designs has, at times, been compromised due to insufficient checks in the building system.

Chief executive Dr Richard Templer says New Zealand engineers do great work every day. However, this report shows the building system is not always catching significant quality issues before designs are built.

He says issues are “systemic”.

“This is a concern to engineers because everyone wants confidence that buildings are robust and safe,” he says.

The report comes in response to a series of high-profile failures in structural design, some of which are used as case studies.

It focuses on the role of engineers in assuring quality, but Templer says all players in the building system have a role in ensuring quality outcomes.

This includes firms, councils and Government, and Templer is “looking forward to talking with Government about its role assuring quality within the built environment”.

Templer says engineers have a duty to be competent and diligent in their work but, occasionally, “negligence, a lack of competence, or human error can lead to quality issues being introduced”.

Engineering New Zealand has already made changes to improve rigour in the profession, including strengthening its assessment and complaints processes within the Chartered Professional Engineer system, and carrying out a desktop review of structural design for 20 warehouses across the country.

Templer says another challenge is the nature of a competitive industry. “There are pressures to keep costs down, and it can mean quality assurance can be compromised,” he says. 

“We know our engineers in the building system are deeply committed to understanding and learning from issues, and taking action to fix gaps and raise sta­ndards,” he says.

The report makes five recommendations:

• supporting councils in their role consenting engineering design work,

• working with the Association of Consulting and Engineering (ACENZ) on its work to improve the robustness of quality assurance processes in New Zealand’s engineering firms,

• advocating for wider building system reform to provide a greater focus on quality,

• strengthening the technical and professional support provided to engineers, and

• strengthening the way engineers are regulated.

“I hope this report promotes a conversation and education about quality control in the building system,” Templer says.

About Engineering NZ and SESOC:

• Engineering New Zealand is New Zealand’s professional body for engineers, with some 22,000 members. It represents and regulates its members. It also acts as the Registration Authority for Chartered Professional Engineers. The organisation provides a “Lessons Learnt” workshop series for its members to improve engineering practice. It is also strengthening its accreditation scheme for Chartered Professional Engineers, including stronger assessment criteria and discipline-specific assessment for high-risk sub-disciplines such as structural engineering.

• The Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand (SESOC) and Engineering New Zealand will hold a webinar for engineers about the report’s findings, and how engineers can avoid making similar mistakes.

Previous articleTop building apprentices go head-to-head for national title
Next articleNevines takes out Apprentice of the Year honours